Nation/World

Trump belittles family of slain Muslim soldier, drawing new ire

Donald Trump belittled the parents of a slain Muslim soldier who strongly denounced Trump during the Democratic National Convention, saying that the soldier's father had delivered the entire speech because his mother was not "allowed" to speak.

Trump's comments, in an interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News that will air Sunday, drew quick and widespread condemnation and amplified calls for Republican leaders to distance themselves from their presidential nominee. With his implication that the soldier's mother had not spoken because of female subservience expected in some traditional strains of Islam, his comments also inflamed his hostilities with American Muslims.

Khizr Khan, the soldier's father, lashed out at Trump in an interview Saturday, saying his wife had not spoken at the convention in Philadelphia because it was too painful for her to talk about her son's death.

Trump, he said, "is devoid of feeling the pain of a mother who has sacrificed her son."

Gov. John Kasich of Ohio, a rival of Trump's in the Republican primaries who has refused to endorse him, castigated him on Twitter. "There's only one way to talk about Gold Star parents: with honor and respect," he wrote, using the term for surviving family members of those who died in war. "Capt. Khan is a hero. Together, we should pray for his family."

Khan's speech at the convention in Philadelphia was one of the most powerful of those given there. It was effectively the Democratic response to comments Trump has made implying many American Muslims have terrorist sympathies or stay silent when they know ones who do. Trump has called to ban Muslim immigration as a way to combat terrorism.

At the convention, Khan spoke about how his 27-year-old son, Humayun Khan, an Army captain, had died in a car bombing in 2004 in Iraq as he tried to save other troops.

ADVERTISEMENT

He criticized Trump, saying he "consistently smears the character of Muslims," and pointedly challenged what sacrifices Trump had made. Khan's wife, Ghazala, stood silently by his side.

Trump told Stephanopoulos that Khizr Khan seemed like a "nice guy" and that he wished him "the best of luck." But, he added, "If you look at his wife, she was standing there, she had nothing to say, she probably — maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say, you tell me."

Trump also told Maureen Dowd of The New York Times on Friday night, "I'd like to hear his wife say something."

Even given Trump's reputation for retaliating when attacked, the remarks were startling. They called to mind one of his earliest counterpunches of the campaign, when he responded to criticism from Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., once a prisoner of war in Vietnam, by saying at an Iowa forum, "I like people that weren't captured."

But McCain has a long history in the public eye. The Khans, before their convention appearance, had spent no time in the public eye.

"Trump is totally void of any decency because he is unaware of how to talk to a Gold Star family and how to speak to a Gold Star mother," Khan said.

Ghazala Khan herself spoke publicly Friday to MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell, saying she "cannot even come in the room where his pictures are."

When she saw her son's photograph on the screen behind her on the stage in Philadelphia, she said, "I couldn't take it."

"I controlled myself at that time," she said while choking back tears. "It is very hard."

In his interview with The New York Times, Khizr Khan said his wife had helped him craft his convention speech and even told him to remove certain attacks he had wanted to make against Trump.

But Saturday, he unmuzzled himself.

"Unlike Donald Trump's wife, I didn't plagiarize my speech," Khan said, referring to how several lines from a Michelle Obama speech found their way into Melania Trump's address at the Republican National Convention.

"I also wanted to talk about how he's had three wives, and yet he talks about others' ethics and their religion," Khan said. "I wanted to say 10 other things about him, and she said, 'Don't go to his level. We are paying tribute to our son.'"

Trump's comments provoked another avalanche of criticism on social media and again put Republican leaders in a difficult position, facing new demands that they repudiate their presidential nominee.

Even before Trump's remarks to ABC News, Khan had asked that Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, and Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the House speaker, denounce Trump.

On Saturday, neither directly addressed Trump's new comments. Don Stewart, a spokesman for McConnell, referred to McConnell's response late last year that a ban on Muslims entering the United States, proposed by Trump, would be unacceptable.

AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Ryan, delivered a similar response: "The speaker has made clear many times that he rejects this idea, and himself has talked about how Muslim Americans have made the ultimate sacrifice for this country."

ADVERTISEMENT

In the same ABC News interview, when Stephanopoulos said that Khan had pointed out that his family would not have been allowed into the United States under Trump's proposed ban, the candidate replied, "He doesn't know that."

And when asked what he would say to the grieving father, Trump replied, "I'd say, 'We've had a lot of problems with radical Islamic terrorism.'"

Stephanopoulos also noted that Khan said Trump had "sacrificed nothing" and had lost no one.

"Who wrote that? Did Hillary's scriptwriters?" Trump replied. "I think I've made a lot of sacrifices. I've worked very, very hard. I've created thousands and thousands of jobs."

Some of the fiercest condemnations Saturday came from Republicans who have argued — unsuccessfully to date — that Trump is unfit to be president.

Tim Miller, a former communications director for Jeb Bush's presidential campaign, called Trump's comments "inhuman."

"Memo to Trump supporters," Peter Wehner, a speechwriter for President George W. Bush, wrote on Twitter. "He's a man of sadistic cruelty. With him there's no bottom. Now go ahead & defend him."

Reihan Salam, a conservative writer for National Review and a frequent Trump critic, said that Trump had an opportunity to declare remorse for the Khans while still holding to his own views as a candidate.

ADVERTISEMENT

"A more skillful communicator would have avoided comparing his sacrifice to that of a parent who had lost his adult son to violence in Iraq, for the obvious reason that there's no way to win," he said. "Instead, he might have asked why Humayun Khan had died in the first place — because of a war that many if not most Americans regard as a tragic blunder, that led to the deaths of thousands of Americans."

"There was really no benefit for Trump in suggesting that Ghazala Khan had been muzzled," he added "because she could easily come out and say that she had been too grief-stricken to speak, which she did."

Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Saturday: "It's really despicable that anyone, let alone a presidential candidate, would choose to dishonor the service of an American who gave his life for this nation."

Ghazala Khan, he said, "was obviously there to support her husband who was offering what many people believe was the most impactful speech of the entire convention."

As is often the case, Trump, who has had no campaign events this weekend, managed with a few words to overshadow his opponent, Hillary Clinton, who was making several stops in Ohio and Pennsylvania with her running mate, Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia.

"I was very moved to see Ghazala Khan stand bravely and with dignity in support of her son on Thursday," Clinton said Saturday in a relatively reserved statement. "This is a time to honor the sacrifice of Captain Khan and all the fallen."

In the ABC News interview, Trump also hedged over whether he would participate in the three scheduled debates with Clinton. He insinuated that she had worked to schedule two of the debates during football games so viewership would be lower.

He also said the National Football League had sent him a letter complaining about debate dates.

The debates were scheduled last September by the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates. And while Joe Lockhart, a spokesman for the National Football League, said the league was not thrilled about the scheduling, "we did not send a letter to Trump."

ADVERTISEMENT